<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sportsnet once again proves what a soccer backwater Canada really is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://footiefool.com/2009/07/02/sportsnet-once-again-proves-what-a-soccer-backwater-canada-really-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://footiefool.com/2009/07/02/sportsnet-once-again-proves-what-a-soccer-backwater-canada-really-is/</link>
	<description>Yet another football/soccer blog by yet another uninformed source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:24:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clint Lalonde</title>
		<link>http://footiefool.com/2009/07/02/sportsnet-once-again-proves-what-a-soccer-backwater-canada-really-is/comment-page-1/#comment-41127</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Lalonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiefool.com/?p=704#comment-41127</guid>
		<description>Fully in agreement, Pompey. The Score has done a bang up job in the&lt;br /&gt;past couple of years with footie. And their crew seem like the most&lt;br /&gt;accessible, responsive and grassroots of any of the major sports&lt;br /&gt;players in this country. Would like to see what they could do with the&lt;br /&gt;rights.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And I am not going to give my local cable company more $$$ for 73&lt;br /&gt;digital channels, of which I only want 1 and only for a few occasions.&lt;br /&gt;Seriously, do I need 4 channels of Sportsnet? Do I really need 24/7&lt;br /&gt;coverage of UFC and Poker? Don&#039;t think so. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully in agreement, Pompey. The Score has done a bang up job in the<br />past couple of years with footie. And their crew seem like the most<br />accessible, responsive and grassroots of any of the major sports<br />players in this country. Would like to see what they could do with the<br />rights.</p>
<p>And I am not going to give my local cable company more $$$ for 73<br />digital channels, of which I only want 1 and only for a few occasions.<br />Seriously, do I need 4 channels of Sportsnet? Do I really need 24/7<br />coverage of UFC and Poker? Don&#039;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Lalonde</title>
		<link>http://footiefool.com/2009/07/02/sportsnet-once-again-proves-what-a-soccer-backwater-canada-really-is/comment-page-1/#comment-41126</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Lalonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiefool.com/?p=704#comment-41126</guid>
		<description>Nope, you are not the only one who sees TV as a dinosaur. The whole&lt;br /&gt;idea of an organization selling away the right to their product in&lt;br /&gt;this day and age is crazy. The means are there for ANYONE to become a&lt;br /&gt;broadcaster. The barriers and costs have come down to the point where&lt;br /&gt;any organization can do it themselves and do it quite well.  UEFA does&lt;br /&gt;it with the Champions League. Major League Baseball, NFL do it as&lt;br /&gt;well. The CSA could take the whole shebang in house, if they so&lt;br /&gt;desired. Like I said in the post, I would buy a feed for the game&lt;br /&gt;tomorrow, but it isn&#039;t even an option. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, you are not the only one who sees TV as a dinosaur. The whole<br />idea of an organization selling away the right to their product in<br />this day and age is crazy. The means are there for ANYONE to become a<br />broadcaster. The barriers and costs have come down to the point where<br />any organization can do it themselves and do it quite well.  UEFA does<br />it with the Champions League. Major League Baseball, NFL do it as<br />well. The CSA could take the whole shebang in house, if they so<br />desired. Like I said in the post, I would buy a feed for the game<br />tomorrow, but it isn&#039;t even an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pompey Canuck</title>
		<link>http://footiefool.com/2009/07/02/sportsnet-once-again-proves-what-a-soccer-backwater-canada-really-is/comment-page-1/#comment-41125</link>
		<dc:creator>Pompey Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiefool.com/?p=704#comment-41125</guid>
		<description>I would like to see a network show some commitment to football - of the major networks so far I have only seen this from The Score - and the CSA demand a commitment when selling the rights.  We saw, or rather didn&#039;t see 11 of 15 matches from the Confederations Cup, UEFA Champions League Semis, and Canada&#039;s final World Cup qualifier.  I would rather pay to watch the matches online from the CSA as opposed to acquiring extra Channels like TSN2, Every Sportsnet, &amp; CBC Bold that will cost me a lot more.  I am worried about being able to watch the Gold Cup now and very worried about watching the World Cup next year.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see a network show some commitment to football &#8211; of the major networks so far I have only seen this from The Score &#8211; and the CSA demand a commitment when selling the rights.  We saw, or rather didn&#039;t see 11 of 15 matches from the Confederations Cup, UEFA Champions League Semis, and Canada&#039;s final World Cup qualifier.  I would rather pay to watch the matches online from the CSA as opposed to acquiring extra Channels like TSN2, Every Sportsnet, &amp; CBC Bold that will cost me a lot more.  I am worried about being able to watch the Gold Cup now and very worried about watching the World Cup next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon</title>
		<link>http://footiefool.com/2009/07/02/sportsnet-once-again-proves-what-a-soccer-backwater-canada-really-is/comment-page-1/#comment-41124</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footiefool.com/?p=704#comment-41124</guid>
		<description>I emailed Sportsnet this morning, and complained to them directly. I encourage everyone to do the same and let Sportsnet know how disappointed in them you are. Living in BC, and paying for Pacific, I feel ripped off. In their reply to me I was told that they have &quot;Commitments&quot; to Baseball. But why not at least stream it online? I don&#039;t know about paying for an online stream, as there are free ones out there, and besides if they would properly show the games on television it wouldn&#039;t be a problem in the first place. Am I the only one who looks at a TV and sees a dinosaur?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I emailed Sportsnet this morning, and complained to them directly. I encourage everyone to do the same and let Sportsnet know how disappointed in them you are. Living in BC, and paying for Pacific, I feel ripped off. In their reply to me I was told that they have &quot;Commitments&quot; to Baseball. But why not at least stream it online? I don&#039;t know about paying for an online stream, as there are free ones out there, and besides if they would properly show the games on television it wouldn&#039;t be a problem in the first place. Am I the only one who looks at a TV and sees a dinosaur?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
